Wednesday 15 July 2009

What Women Want

Do you remember the 2000 box office hit film What Women Want ?


Mel Gibson play an Advertising Executive, who by freakish accident is able to hear the thoughts of women and uses his new found talent for unscrupulous means and to further his career in the advertising agency world.

Now you're probably thinking 'this supposed to be a blog about design? Not some sort of film review'


Well in the film Mel has to design an ad campaign for a shoe manufacture... see, it is about design, oh ye of little faith.


Mel's accident happens in the bathroom when he's electrocuted whilst holding a hair dryer and trying on some women's' products in order to help him understand his target market. The morning after he is able to hear what women are thinking.


Now over the years I have heard many a fellow complain 'what do women want?' Some claim that even women themselves don't know what they want. Now before rushing to comment that I'm some sort of neanderthal misogynist, please read on, because believe me or not, I'm going somewhere with this.


Empathy... said to be one of the key personality traits of a designer. If a man was truly empathic towards a woman's needs, wouldn't he know, What Women Want?


I've bee told that "sometimes" I'm in touch with my feminine side. Whether or not that is true, I do make an effort to try and 'walk a mile in someone else's shoes' be that a woman, a teenager a child , whoever.


The thing is with empathy you can't really be truly empathic until you are able to draw parallels with others feelings about a situation with your own feelings towards situations in which you have found yourself in the past that are at least similar enough for you to understand their emotional frame of mind.


My partner Anj and I met via the Internet. We got together because we have such deep empathy for each other. This is because whilst living more than 300 miles apart, we have led similar lives and have remarkably similar motivations and thinking. Sometimes its almost ethereal and scary how we just know what the other is thinking... we even think the same things at the same time... even when we are apart (which is rare). Once we even had the very same dream on the very same night... how cool is that?


Now, although I can be empathic, I must confess that I am not naturally an empathic person. I have to think about my feelings and those of other in an analytical way. I am after all of the INTJ Jung, Briggs, Myers personality type.


In 2005 I took part in a worldwide study (run by the BBC in the UK) to determine differences in the ways in which men an women think. This was shown on BBC1 in July 2005 and can be found on Youtube in 6 parts.


The study for me was an emotional journey of self discover. I learned that my awareness that I lack natural empathy does not prevent me form learning to emulate it, but for sure I learned many years earlier when I worked in marketing that you certainly can't fake it.


The BBC, concerned about my reaction to the 'nappy test' part of the study (2m 40s in on this video), they very kindly paid for some counseling with a psychologist, to help me better understand my reaction. I had held my father to blame for my feelings of underachievement but through the conversations with the psychologist I leaned a hidden truth about myself. My relentless push for Utopian perfection in all that I do, was producing some negative emotional reactions to any for of critique and in particular from my father whom I hold in high esteem for his own achievements.. I felt in fact somewhat in my fathers shadow. When I later discussed this with my father I learned from him that he made his critical observations as he felt I had more to give.. he even declared that he felt he was living in MY shadow. I was shocked I can tell you. Of course now when I see someone who is something of a perfectionist, I can empathise with their emotional turmoil of never being able to reach their goal. I can tell of my experiences and hopefully help such a person to come to terms wit the fact as a perfectionist, you will never be satisfied, but to take encouragement that everyday, you take a step further to the impossible dream.



The rising trend for 'Design Thinking' is an attempt mostly by the business community and by some design companies to cash in on the personality traits of designers, attempting to emulate such values as empathy. I do believe that these 'design thinkers' could emulate such a personality but I do have one or two reservations.Check Spelling

Some of those who are expressing interest in 'design thinking' seem to have missed the point somewhat and give the impression that they are not attempting to use 'design thinking' for the purpose of creatively solving problems that effect the quality of life for the users of product and service, but are trying to manipulate 'design thinking' to make more profit.

True 'design thinkers' are not so self serving in my opinion. Of course there are those who are designers and whose apparent primary aim is to make as much money as possible, using design as a means to an end, just as there are those who are not designers, whose primary course of action is to bring benefit to mankind, with profit as a by-product of their transactional processes.

Coming full circle, I wonder what an average 'design thinker' would make of some observations I've made about what women want. Could it be....

  • Flowers?
  • A pretty designer dress?
  • Expensive perfume?
  • Jimmy Choo shoes?

before considering those, ask yourself these questions: -

  • When a woman is hassled for erm.... 'intimacy' with her partner, Why does she often dress dowdily and eat lots of chocolate and sulk rather a lot?
  • Why does a woman, whose homestead is fraught with aggression, indifference, patronising speech etc. Why does she feel the need to dress up, buy flowers, wear perfume and jewelry when she is with her friends?

Conversely

  • Why is it, when that same woman feels special because she is loved for whom she is. Is appreciated for the human being she wants to be. Is encouraged with affection to do the things she has her heart set upon. Why is it such a woman feels no need to prune and beautify herself to excess when with those very same friends?

What Do Woman want?

Perhaps if you need to ask the question, then it may already be too late

I would like to give special thanks to Becky Blackwell, Raymond Pirouz and an extra special thankyou to my Anj x for helping me put together my thoughts for this blog post

6 comments:

  1. Hi Lloyd,

    After a decade of being married, the thing I've learned about 'what women want' is to sit down (literally) ask, and be ready for a surprise because it's never what you think. :) But it really took me several years into our marriage for me to figure out to even ask rather than assume or observe to try to figure it out...asking and offering an empathetic ear alone goes a long way. Hard lessons of marriage. ;)

    Great post. Yes, when I first started hearing the Design Thinking meme in regard to business I giggled to myself, thinking that when business REALLY figures out what design thinking is all about, they're not going to be wanting to do it! What with the fact that it'll cost them more in the near term (given the extra care and attention to important issues they usually dismiss for the sake of quick profits) but it will reward them handsomly at the end.

    This is why I determined that in order to have business adopt true design thinking into the process, they would have to drop the short-term oriented thinking and repalce it with a sustainable, long-term model.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Raymond,

    Indeed. Often we men, try to 'fix' things. more often this only make things worse.

    Interestingly, business often fails to "sit down and ask", instead trying to fix things without realy listening.

    I see the current trend for 'design thinking' as a quick fix for the woes of ecconomic downturn. Only when business realises that ecconomic down turns are cyclic, and therfore need to invest in real wealth and for the long term, thinking perhaps a hundred years ahead or more, taking such rise and fall of finance based ecconomy. Such long term, humanitarian approach will actually lenghten the cycle between reccessions and shorten the term of depression according to some ecconomic theorists. A spirit of co-operation rather than dog-eat-dog competition will bring about increased sustainability. I'm not sugesting an expicit cartel or even a tacit one, I refer infact ot John Forbes Nash's game theory of 'equilibrium, but in a modified form, inline with your 'design orientation' model

    ReplyDelete
  3. Exactly, Lloyd.

    Business has to look beyond the short-term and beyond the 'cycle'. This is easier said than done, and will require a shift in thinking, because so long as those profiting from the stock market cycles continue to make 'their' profits, they will see nothing wrong with the game until the entire board crumbles before them...and then it will be too late.

    Sustainable profiteering -- sounds like an oxymoron. Maybe it is, but only by engaging the process will we find out if there is an alternative, and what that might look like.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interestingly Raymond, you point to another trait of the 'designer', that of fearless experimenting.

    That's not to imply designers are reckless. Designers (should) always look closely at risk, looking for creative ways to mitigate against any potential negative impact of their decision making.

    Business on the other hand looks to mitigate the risk by simply passing the risk on such as Asset Backed Securities and Collateralized Debt Obligations... and just look where that's taken us.

    That wasn't ‘design thinking’, that was 'cover my ass thinking'

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, exactly. There are 2 ways to deal with risk:

    1. Assess the risk, design around it or question the initial effort altogether if the risk can not be avoided.

    2. Pass on the risk.

    Only one is sustainable. In other words, if there was no way to sensibly make loans to people who couldn't afford to pay them and sell those loans off to others who then insured against losses on those loans, that entire line of thinking should have been questioned and never implemented if are talking 'design thinking'. Now, when I said that design thinking is 'dead' I was using tongue-in-cheek humor to insinuate that only under a design oriented mindset can firms truly make use of design thinking. Otherwise it's just sugar-coated innovation talk for the sake of a faster/shortcut road to short-term profits.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I totally agree Raymond. Design thinking didn't just die... it was killed, murdered in fact... just after it had been raped and pillaged by those who can't WON'T take responsibility for risk assessment and mitigation, those who are finance oriented. Money, money, money... me, me, me thinking!

    The greatest challenge we face, to turn around this thinking is to present the material in clear, concise and structured way in which the finance oriented world can comprehend. This would be the starting point from which we can move forward to an unstructured, free and more complex way of thinking... to become socioeconomically sustainable future oriented… to become ‘design oriented’

    Before we remove the supporting structure of ‘finance orientation’ we need to put in place a palatable supporting structure for ‘design orientation’

    ReplyDelete